High Court judge delays unique Haringey Social Services bid to split up family

The judge said he wanted to wait to hear the views of the children before making a decision in the case

The judge said he wanted to wait to hear the views of the children before making a decision in the case

First published in News
Last updated
by

A unique High Court bid by social workers from Haringey to break up a family by giving two young children new identities and banning their five older sisters and brothers from seeing them was stopped in its tracks by a judge today.

Senior Family Division judge Mr Justice Holman refused to rubber stamp the plan and ordered that the children be separately represented so that their views could be heard.

All seven children are the natural siblings of the same Nigerian parents, who are both currently in prison serving sentences for ill treatment of all or some of their children.

Prospective adopters have been found for the two youngest children, and social workers want to change their identities to protect them from their abusive parents.

Social workers wanted to change the children’s surnames and forenames, as well as stopping their brothers and sisters from contacting them or knowing where they are in case their whereabouts was revealed to the parents.

Several years ago the eldest five, now aged from seven to 13, were taken into care by Haringey social services, but no adoption was ever contemplated, and they are with long-time carers in three separate homes.

In May 2012 the two youngest, now aged three and two, were taken into care with plans to have them adopted, but they were granted contact with their siblings.

Mr Justice Holman said that since then there had been contact and “it appears that all the children enjoy and gain support and benefit from that contact”.

He said: “I understand that the essential reasoning and justification that lies behind that is that the parents of the children promoted a considerable campaign on the internet and in other places with regard to this case so that the names of their children have apparently gained some notoriety.

“The local authority is fearful that unless the two youngest children are given completely new identities with completely new names, they will be tracked down and the placement potentially destabilised.

“But to change now the forenames by which a child, now almost four, has been known and has known herself throughout her whole life obviously raises considerable issues with regard to her sense of identity and self-esteem.”

The judge said the council’s own social worker admitted that splitting up the children with no contact between the elder five and younger two until they were at least 18 would cause “grief” as well as “pain and loss.”

But he said there would be help and support from the professionals and foster carers to help them cope with it.

He added he was “frankly astonished” that he was expected to reach a decision about their futures in a day without hearing from the children, but was also “deeply conscious” of the “worrying” delay in the case.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:18am Fri 4 Apr 14

Terry365 says...

Ask the children. Now, why didn't Haringey Social Services think of that? Ah, yes, it prefers to issue dictats.

Deal with the parents, who are the real problem. Leave the children in peace. They've suffered enough already.
Ask the children. Now, why didn't Haringey Social Services think of that? Ah, yes, it prefers to issue dictats. Deal with the parents, who are the real problem. Leave the children in peace. They've suffered enough already. Terry365
  • Score: 0

10:55am Sat 5 Apr 14

ZenithB says...

Assemble a dozen or so good parents from the community and ask them their advice before going too far afield. Their advice is likely to be of more advantage to the children than what those often blinded by their own very training can arrive at in a stultified atmosphere. The first asinine mistake of the local authority is already well reflected in what the judge has said.
Assemble a dozen or so good parents from the community and ask them their advice before going too far afield. Their advice is likely to be of more advantage to the children than what those often blinded by their own very training can arrive at in a stultified atmosphere. The first asinine mistake of the local authority is already well reflected in what the judge has said. ZenithB
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree